2009-11-29

Arguments


1. Substituting aspartame for sugar increases the risk of cancer. It is easier to manage diabetes than to manage cancer. So, no aspartame

2. The probability of contracting cancer is very low when compared to the probability of contracting diabetes. So, lets opt for aspartame.

There are meetings with group-think. And there are meetings with pole-apart arguments.

No comments:

2009-11-29

Arguments


1. Substituting aspartame for sugar increases the risk of cancer. It is easier to manage diabetes than to manage cancer. So, no aspartame

2. The probability of contracting cancer is very low when compared to the probability of contracting diabetes. So, lets opt for aspartame.

There are meetings with group-think. And there are meetings with pole-apart arguments.

No comments: